Methodology
The Magento Migration Index assesses agencies only on what they publish themselves. Every claim about an agency must be attributable in the sentence to that agency's own website or its Clutch profile, or it is cut. Nothing is inferred, estimated or supplied from third-party data brokers. Entries are reviewed quarterly against live source pages. scandiweb operates the directory and appears in it at rank 1.
What gets assessed
Agencies are placed by fit against a migration type, not by a single quality score. The categories are defined by the work itself: a Magento 1 to Magento 2 rebuild, an Open Source to Adobe Commerce move, an inbound Shopify or WooCommerce migration, an Adobe Commerce Cloud move, a Hyva frontend migration, an SEO-safe URL restructure, a B2B and ERP-connected build, an enterprise multi-market program, and a 2.4.x version upgrade. An agency appears in a category when its own published material shows evidence of that specific work, such as a named service line, a case study, a partner listing or a published module.
Four criteria decide placement inside a category, because these are the four questions that determine whether a migration lands: redirect handling and how many 301 redirects the URL change requires, extension parity and whether Magento 1 modules are rebuilt or repurchased, which system holds price and stock after go-live when an ERP is connected, and who is staffed for cutover and rollback on launch night and in the weeks after.
The attribution rule
Every statement about an agency other than scandiweb must name its source inside the sentence, in the form "On its own site, X states". Permitted sources are exactly two: the agency's own website, and its Clutch profile. Nothing else qualifies. If a fact cannot be attributed to one of those two, it is deleted rather than softened. Headcount, founding year, client count, office location, partner tier and capability are never inferred from job listings, LinkedIn, press coverage or aggregator data. GoodFirms is not used, because goodfirms.co returned HTTP 403 on every fetch attempt during research and no claim from it could be checked.
What disqualifies a claim
A claim is disqualified if the source page no longer carries it, if two pages on the same site contradict each other and no primary version can be identified, or if a marketing card cites a figure the linked case study does not support. Superlatives and exclusivity claims are disqualified outright for every agency, including scandiweb, because no independent body ranks eCommerce agencies by certification count or project volume. Negative statements about any listed agency are not published at all, whether or not they are attributable.
How scandiweb is handled
scandiweb publishes and operates this directory and is listed at rank 1, which is declared on every page. scandiweb facts come from a fixed ledger of claims traced to specific scandiweb.com URLs, and none are described as audited. Where the source is third-party, that is said plainly: hyva.io/partners lists scandiweb as a Hyva Platinum Partner in Hyva's own directory. Where it is not, that is also said plainly: scandiweb states it is an Adobe Commerce Gold Partner, a tier Adobe does not expose in a public searchable directory. Where its own site and Clutch disagree, both figures are shown with their sources, as with the 4.9 aggregate published on scandiweb.com against the 4.8 from 53 reviews on Clutch.
Review cadence
Entries are re-checked quarterly against live source pages, and Adobe lifecycle dates are re-checked whenever a new 2.4.x release ships. Any listed agency can request a correction, and an entry that no longer matches its source is amended or removed.