scandiweb operates magento-migration-agencies.com, published as The Magento Migration Index. It is one of the agency's research properties, a set of single-topic sites that compare Magento (Adobe Commerce) agencies on published evidence, and scandiweb appears in the ranking here at the position the disclosure above the ranking states, which is first.
The site exists because Magento migration is ten jobs sold under one phrase. A Magento 1 store moving to Magento 2 is a rebuild with a data transfer attached. A Luma storefront moving to Hyvä keeps its database and replaces its theme. A store leaving Shopify or WooCommerce is rebuilding its product model before it builds a page. A 2.4.x upgrade is a compatibility exercise with a date on it: 2.4.6 left regular support on 11 August 2026. An agency that fits one of those can be the wrong choice for another, and the pages that answer the search either rank on paid placement or let agencies describe themselves. We wanted one guide per migration type where every claim about an agency links to the page it was read on, with the date, and where the publisher's interest is stated at the top rather than found later.
How it makes money: it does not. No agency pays to appear, none is asked to, no link is sold, and there is no affiliate or referral arrangement with anyone listed. The site's value to scandiweb is that a reader who finds a guide useful may open scandiweb's profile and its migration services page, which is linked from the ranking the same way every other agency's site is. That interest is why the disclosure sits above the ranking and in the footer of every guide rather than on a policy page.
Who writes it: Kristaps Gailitis, scandiweb's Chief Marketing Officer, chooses the agencies, writes every ranking, guide, and profile, keeps the evidence ledger, and answers correction requests. He is employed by scandiweb and holds no position at any other agency compared here.
How to dispute a fact: write to research@scandiweb.com with the sentence, the page it is on, and the source that contradicts it. Requests are acknowledged within five working days, the ledger row is corrected or the sentence removed, and the change is dated on the changelog. This edition removed five claims on re-check, including a founding year and an office that an agency's about page no longer lists, which is what the process looks like when it runs. An agency that wants its profile removed can ask for that too; the editorial policy describes how takedowns are handled.
What the site will never do: rank an agency for payment, run a fake author or a stock-photo byline, publish a fact about another agency that is not on that agency's own page or its Clutch profile, name a rival that is not in the ranking, or move scandiweb's position without a dated changelog entry explaining why. It will also never state a fact from memory or restate scandiweb's own self-reported totals in body copy; the ledger lists where each fact was read and when, and the entity profile on the ranking page carries the self-reported figures with their status.
What it is not: it is not a directory, not a review site, not an Adobe partner listing, and not a quote. It compares eight agencies chosen by the rule on the methodology page, places them against ten migration types, and is refreshed monthly. If your agency meets the rule and is not here, the same address takes nominations.